The Comparative Analysis :
KIA Optima 2.0 Automatic (13 - 15) vs. Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo Automatic (12 - 18)
€ 29,600

€ 39,600

€ 29,600
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 39,600
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The KIA Optima 2.0 is considerably bigger in every dimension. It's 7.9 inches longer, an inch wider and 1.1 inches taller than the Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo.
KIA Optima 2.0
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
57.3
72
79.9
56.2
71.1
78.9
72 in
Width
71.1 in
79.9 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
78.9 in
57.3 in
Height
56.2 in
110
190.7
109.3
182.8
190.7 in
Length
182.8 in
110 in
Wheelbase
109.3 in
Vehicle Weight
KIA Optima 2.0
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
3362 lb
Curb Weight
3395 lb
4409 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
No data

Weight Difference:
33 lb
0.97 %

General
KIA Optima 2.0
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
TF
Generation
ATS
Sedan
Car Body Style
Sedan
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Premium Unleaded

Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Rear-wheel drive

6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed automatic transmission
Engine
KIA Optima 2.0
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
Straight-four gasoline engine (naturally aspirated engine)
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine with turbocharger
Engine Series
GM 2.0L Ecotec Turbo I4
Engine Code
LTG

4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
163 hp
at 6500 rpm
Power
272 hp
at 5500 rpm
KIA Optima 2.0
163 hp
272 hp
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
145 lb‑ft
at 4800 rpm
Max. Torque
260 lb‑ft
at 1700 rpm
KIA Optima 2.0
145 lb‑ft
260 lb‑ft
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
Performance
KIA Optima 2.0
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
126 mph
Maximum Speed
149 mph
10.6 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
5.9 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
482 ft
0.000 sec

KIA Optima 2.0
62 mph
62
mph
mph
269 ft
0.000 sec

Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
▶ REPLAY
20.63 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
12.48 lb/hp
KIA Optima 2.0
20.63 lb/hp
12.48 lb/hp
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
Fuel Economy / Emissions
KIA Optima 2.0
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
Fuel Economy
31 mpg
combined
29 mpg
KIA Optima 2.0
31 mpg
29 mpg
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
23 mpg
city
20 mpg
39 mpg
highway
No data
18.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
16.6 gal
572 mi
Range
477 mi
KIA Optima 2.0
572 mi
477 mi
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
Environmental Impact
144 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
155.3 kWh
KIA Optima 2.0
144 kWh
155.3 kWh
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
285 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
307 g/mi (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
KIA Optima 2.0
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
1047 lb
Maximum Payload
No data
14.3 cu ft
Trunk Volume
10.8 cu ft







No data
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
No data