The Comparative Analysis :

Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..) vs. Ford Focus Saloon 1.6 Ti-VCT (11 - 12)

€ 30,800
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..) Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
€ 21,000
 Ford Focus Saloon 1.6 Ti-VCT (11 - 12) Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
€ 30,800
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 21,000

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid is 12.6 cm longer, 2.8 cm narrower and 4.4 cm lower than the Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT.
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
1440
Blueprint Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..)
1795
2028
1484
Blueprint Ford Focus Saloon 1.6 Ti-VCT (11 - 12)
1823
2015
1795 mm
Width
1823 mm
2028 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2015 mm
1440 mm
Height
1484 mm
Blueprint Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..)
2725
4660
Blueprint Ford Focus Saloon 1.6 Ti-VCT (11 - 12)
2650
4534
4660 mm
Length
4534 mm
2725 mm
Wheelbase
2650 mm

Vehicle Weight

Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
1426 kg
Kerb Weight
1296 kg
1927 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
1825 kg
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..)
Weight Difference:
130 kg
9.12 %
Ford Focus Saloon 1.6 Ti-VCT (11 - 12)

General

Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
BP
Generation
DYB
Saloon
Car Body Style
Saloon
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
5-speed manual transmission

Engine

Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
4-cylinder mild hybrid petrol engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1998 CC
Engine Capacity
1596 CC
178 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Power
123 bhp
at 6300 rpm
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
178 bhp
123 bhp
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
224 NM
at 3000 rpm
Max. Torque
159 NM
at 4000 rpm
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
224 NM
159 NM
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT

Performance

Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
134 mph
Maximum Speed
123 mph
8.6 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
11 sec
62 mph 62
mph

119 m
0.000 sec

Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid

62 mph 62
mph

153 m
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT

▶ REPLAY
8.01 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
10.54 kg/bhp
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
8.01 kg/bhp
10.54 kg/bhp
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Fuel Economy
54 mpg
combined
47 mpg
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
54 mpg
47 mpg
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
46 mpg
city
35 mpg
61 mpg
motorway
59 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
51 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
55 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
610 mi
Range
570 mi
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
610 mi
570 mi
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Environmental Impact
98.5 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
113.6 kWh
Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
98.5 kWh
113.6 kWh
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR
Emission Standard
Euro 5
142 g/km (WLTP)
CO2 Emissions
139 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Mazda 3 Fastback SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
501 kg
Maximum Payload
529 kg
450 L
Boot Capacity
475 L
No data
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
No data