The Comparative Analysis :
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150 (20 - ..) vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15)
€ 25,800
€ 40,300
€ 25,800
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 40,300
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150 is 3 cm longer, 10.5 cm narrower and 9.5 cm lower than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4.
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
1540
1795
2040
1635
1900
2100
1795 mm
Width
1900 mm
2040 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2100 mm
1540 mm
Height
1635 mm
2655
4395
2660
4365
4395 mm
Length
4365 mm
2655 mm
Wheelbase
2660 mm
Vehicle Weight
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
1443 kg
Kerb Weight
1640 kg
1965 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2350 kg
Weight Difference:
197 kg
12.01 %
General
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
DM
Generation
LV
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Permanent all-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed automatic transmission
Engine
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
4-cylinder mild hybrid petrol engine (naturally aspirated engine)
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine with turbocharger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1998 CC
Engine Capacity
1999 CC
148 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Power
237 bhp
at 5500 rpm
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150
148 bhp
237 bhp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
213 NM
at 4000 rpm
Max. Torque
340 NM
at 1750 rpm
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150
213 NM
340 NM
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Performance
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
123 mph
Maximum Speed
135 mph
8.8 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.6 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
122 m
0.000 sec
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150
62 mph
62
mph
mph
106 m
0.000 sec
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
▶ REPLAY
9.75 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
6.92 kg/bhp
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150
9.75 kg/bhp
6.92 kg/bhp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Fuel Economy
55 mpg
combined
32 mpg
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150
55 mpg
32 mpg
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
46 mpg
city
24 mpg
63 mpg
motorway
41 mpg
51 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
70 L
621 mi
Range
500 mi
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150
621 mi
500 mi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Environmental Impact
96.6 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
164.8 kWh
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150
96.6 kWh
164.8 kWh
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR
Emission Standard
Euro 5
133 g/km (WLTP)
CO2 Emissions
199 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-G 2.0 M Hybrid 150
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
522 kg
Maximum Payload
710 kg
430 L
Boot Capacity
575 L
1406 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1445 L
