The Comparative Analysis :
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid SKYACTIV-Drive (19 - ..) vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e Automatic (20 - ..)
€ 29,300
€ 50,800
€ 29,300
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 50,800
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid is 2.4 cm longer, 10.5 cm narrower and 10.9 cm lower than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e.
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
1540
1795
2040
1649
1900
2100
1795 mm
Width
1900 mm
2040 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2100 mm
1540 mm
Height
1649 mm
2655
4395
2681
4371
4395 mm
Length
4371 mm
2655 mm
Wheelbase
2681 mm
Vehicle Weight
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
1466 kg
Kerb Weight
2157 kg
1965 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2660 kg
Weight Difference:
691 kg
32.04 %
General
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
DM
Generation
L551
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Permanent all-wheel drive
6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
8-speed automatic transmission
Engine
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
4-cylinder mild hybrid petrol engine (naturally aspirated engine)
Engine Type
3-cylinder plug-in hybrid petrol engine with turbocharger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
3
1998 CC
Engine Capacity
1497 CC
178 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Power
305 bhp
at 5500 rpm
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
178 bhp
305 bhp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
224 NM
at 3000 rpm
Max. Torque
540 NM
at 2000 rpm
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
224 NM
540 NM
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Performance
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
127 mph
Maximum Speed
132 mph
8.8 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
6.4 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
122 m
0.000 sec
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
62 mph
62
mph
mph
89 m
0.000 sec
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
▶ REPLAY
8.24 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
7.07 kg/bhp
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
8.24 kg/bhp
7.07 kg/bhp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Fuel Economy
54 mpg
combined
149 mpg
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
54 mpg
149 mpg
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
46 mpg
city
No data
61 mpg
motorway
No data
51 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
43 L
610 mi
Range
1406 mi
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
610 mi
1406 mi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Environmental Impact
98.5 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
36 kWh
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
98.5 kWh
36 kWh
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR
146 g/km (WLTP)
CO2 Emissions
43 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Mazda CX-30 SKYACTIV-X 2.0 M Hybrid
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P300e
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
499 kg
Maximum Payload
503 kg
430 L
Boot Capacity
472 L
1406 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1156 L
