The Comparative Analysis :
Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (19 - ..) vs. Honda CR-V 2.0 2WD (12 - 15)
€ 71,300

€ 25,000

€ 71,300
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 25,000
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Mercedes EQC 400 is 19.2 cm longer, 6.4 cm wider and 6.1 cm lower than the Honda CR-V 2.0.
Mercedes EQC 400
Honda CR-V 2.0
1624
1884
2096
1685
1820
2020
1884 mm
Width
1820 mm
2096 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2020 mm
1624 mm
Height
1685 mm
2873
4762
2630
4570
4762 mm
Length
4570 mm
2873 mm
Wheelbase
2630 mm
Vehicle Weight
Mercedes EQC 400
Honda CR-V 2.0
2495 kg
Kerb Weight
1527 kg
2940 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
1955 kg

Weight Difference:
968 kg
38.8 %

General
Mercedes EQC 400
Honda CR-V 2.0
N293
Generation
RE6
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Electricity
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)

Permanent all-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive

1-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission
Engine
Mercedes EQC 400
Honda CR-V 2.0
Asynchronous motor
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine (naturally aspirated engine)
0
Valves
4
0
Cylinders
4
0 CC
Engine Capacity
1997 CC
402 bhp
at 0 rpm
Power
153 bhp
at 6700 rpm
Mercedes EQC 400
402 bhp
153 bhp
Honda CR-V 2.0
760 NM
at 0 rpm
Max. Torque
192 NM
at 4300 rpm
Mercedes EQC 400
760 NM
192 NM
Honda CR-V 2.0
Performance
Mercedes EQC 400
Honda CR-V 2.0
112 mph
Maximum Speed
118 mph
5.1 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
10 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
71 m
0.000 sec

Mercedes EQC 400
62 mph
62
mph
mph
139 m
0.000 sec

Honda CR-V 2.0
▶ REPLAY
6.21 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
9.98 kg/bhp
Mercedes EQC 400
6.21 kg/bhp
9.98 kg/bhp
Honda CR-V 2.0
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Mercedes EQC 400
Honda CR-V 2.0
Fuel Economy
32 kWh✽
( 126 MPGe ⓘ Miles per gallon petrol equivalent (MPGe) is a measure of the average distance traveled per unit of energy consumed. MPGe, specified in miles per imperial gallon (~4.546 litres), is used to compare the energy consumption of vehicles that use different energy sources.)
combined ✽ per 100 miles
39 mpg
Mercedes EQC 400
126 MPGe
39 mpg
Honda CR-V 2.0
No data
city
32 mpg
No data
motorway
46 mpg
80 kWh
Fuel Tank Capacity
58 L
252 mi
Range
501 mi
Mercedes EQC 400
252 mi
501 mi
Honda CR-V 2.0
Environmental Impact
64.1 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
136.5 kWh
Mercedes EQC 400
64.1 kWh
136.5 kWh
Honda CR-V 2.0
Elektrofahrzeug
Emission Standard
Euro 5
0 g/km (WLTP)
CO2 Emissions
168 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Mercedes EQC 400
Honda CR-V 2.0
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
445 kg
Maximum Payload
428 kg
500 L
Boot Capacity
589 L










1460 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1669 L