The Comparative Analysis :

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11) vs. Ford Focus Sedan 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel (Ethanol) (11 - 12)

€ 36,000
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11) Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
€ 20,800
 Ford Focus Sedan 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel (Ethanol) (11 - 12) Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel
€ 36,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 20,800

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo is 1.4 inches longer, 2.5 inches narrower and 0.2 inches taller than the Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel.
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel
58.7
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
69.3
80.5
58.4
Blueprint Ford Focus Sedan 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel (Ethanol) (11 - 12)
71.8
79.3
69.3 in
Width
71.8 in
80.5 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
79.3 in
58.7 in
Height
58.4 in
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
103.7
179.9
Blueprint Ford Focus Sedan 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel (Ethanol) (11 - 12)
104.3
178.5
179.9 in
Length
178.5 in
103.7 in
Wheelbase
104.3 in

Vehicle Weight

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel
No data
Curb Weight
2857 lb
No data
Gross Vehicle
Weight
4023 lb
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
Weight Difference:
No data
No data
Ford Focus Sedan 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel (Ethanol) (11 - 12)

General

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel
CY0
Generation
DYB
Sedan
Car Body Style
Sedan
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Ethanol
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
5-speed manual transmission

Engine

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
1.6 L / 78 cu in
237 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
118 hp
at 6300 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
237 hp
118 hp
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel
253 lb‑ft
at 2500 rpm
Max. Torque
117 lb‑ft
at 4000 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
253 lb‑ft
117 lb‑ft
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel

Performance

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel
143 mph
Maximum Speed
121 mph
7 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
11.2 sec
62 mph 62
mph

318 ft
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo

62 mph 62
mph

512 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel

▶ REPLAY
No data
Weight-to-Power Ratio
24.21 lb/hp
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
0 lb/hp
24.21 lb/hp
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel
Fuel Economy
24 mpg
combined
28 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
24 mpg
28 mpg
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel
17 mpg
city
21 mpg
30 mpg
highway
36 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
14.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
14.5 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
342 mi
Range
412 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
342 mi
412 mi
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel
Environmental Impact
189.4 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
263 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
189.4 kWh
263 kWh
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel
Euro 4 / Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
383 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
217 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Flexifuel
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
No data
Maximum Payload
1166 lb
9.1 cu ft
Trunk Volume
13.5 cu ft
No data
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
No data