The Comparative Analysis :

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (10 - 16) vs. Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost (11 - 14)

€ 17,000
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (10 - 16) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
€ 25,100
 Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost (11 - 14) Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
€ 17,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 25,100

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec is 8.9 inches longer, 2.5 inches narrower and 1.2 inches taller than the Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp.
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
59.6
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (10 - 16)
69.3
80.5
58.4
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost (11 - 14)
71.8
79.3
69.3 in
Width
71.8 in
80.5 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
79.3 in
59.6 in
Height
58.4 in
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (10 - 16)
103.7
180.5
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost (11 - 14)
104.3
171.6
180.5 in
Length
171.6 in
103.7 in
Wheelbase
104.3 in

Vehicle Weight

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
2965 lb
Curb Weight
2939 lb
3968 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
4189 lb
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (10 - 16)
Weight Difference:
26 lb
0.88 %
Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost (11 - 14)

General

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
CY0
Generation
DYB
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
5-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission

Engine

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Straight-four gasoline engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1.6 L / 78 cu in
Displacement
1.6 L / 78 cu in
115 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
180 hp
at 5700 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
115 hp
180 hp
Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
114 lb‑ft
at 4000 rpm
Max. Torque
177 lb‑ft
at 1600 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
114 lb‑ft
177 lb‑ft
Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp

Performance

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
117 mph
Maximum Speed
138 mph
11.1 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.9 sec
62 mph 62
mph

505 ft
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec

62 mph 62
mph

361 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp

▶ REPLAY
25.78 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
16.33 lb/hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
25.78 lb/hp
16.33 lb/hp
Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Fuel Economy
43 mpg
combined
40 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
43 mpg
40 mpg
Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
34 mpg
city
31 mpg
50 mpg
highway
48 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
15.6 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
14.5 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
667 mi
Range
579 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
667 mi
579 mi
Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Environmental Impact
104.1 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
111.8 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
104.1 kWh
111.8 kWh
Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Euro 5 / Euro 6
Emission Standard
Euro 5
206 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
220 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
1003 lb
Maximum Payload
1250 lb
8.2 cu ft
Trunk Volume
10.3 cu ft
38.2 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
32.5 cu ft