The Comparative Analysis :

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (15 - 17) vs. Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g (14 - 17)

€ 18,500
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (15 - 17) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
€ 20,800
 Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g (14 - 17) Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
€ 18,500
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 20,800

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec is 22.5 cm longer, 6.3 cm narrower and 4.6 cm taller than the Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp.
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
1515
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (15 - 17)
1760
2029
1469
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g (14 - 17)
1823
2015
1760 mm
Width
1823 mm
2029 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2015 mm
1515 mm
Height
1469 mm
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (15 - 17)
2635
4585
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g (14 - 17)
2650
4360
4585 mm
Length
4360 mm
2635 mm
Wheelbase
2650 mm

Vehicle Weight

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
1345 kg
Kerb Weight
1276 kg
1800 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
1900 kg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec (15 - 17)
Weight Difference:
69 kg
5.13 %
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g (14 - 17)

General

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
CY0
Generation
DYB
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
5-speed manual transmission
Transmission
5-speed manual transmission

Engine

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
Straight-four petrol engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
Engine Type
Straight-three petrol engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
3
1590 CC
Engine Capacity
998 CC
115 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Power
99 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
115 bhp
99 bhp
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
154 NM
at 4000 rpm
Max. Torque
170 NM
at 1400 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
154 NM
170 NM
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp

Performance

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
117 mph
Maximum Speed
115 mph
11.1 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.5 sec
62 mph 62
mph

154 m
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec

62 mph 62
mph

174 m
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp

▶ REPLAY
11.7 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
12.89 kg/bhp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
11.7 kg/bhp
12.89 kg/bhp
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
Fuel Economy
51 mpg
combined
66 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
51 mpg
66 mpg
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
40 mpg
city
51 mpg
60 mpg
motorway
78 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
59 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
55 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
667 mi
Range
795 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
667 mi
795 mi
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
Environmental Impact
104.1 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
81.4 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
104.1 kWh
81.4 kWh
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
128 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
99 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.6 ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost 99g Start/Stopp
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
455 kg
Maximum Payload
624 kg
288 L
Boot Capacity
363 L
1349 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1262 L