The Comparative Analysis :

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15) vs. Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel (Ethanol) (13 - 14)

€ 24,000
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
€ 22,000
 Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel (Ethanol) (13 - 14) Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel
€ 24,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 22,000

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec is 22.7 cm longer, 6.3 cm narrower and 3.1 cm taller than the Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel.
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel
1515
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15)
1760
2044
1484
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel (Ethanol) (13 - 14)
1823
2015
1760 mm
Width
1823 mm
2044 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2015 mm
1515 mm
Height
1484 mm
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15)
2635
4585
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel (Ethanol) (13 - 14)
2650
4358
4585 mm
Length
4358 mm
2635 mm
Wheelbase
2650 mm

Vehicle Weight

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel
1540 kg
Kerb Weight
1333 kg
1970 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
1900 kg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15)
Weight Difference:
207 kg
13.44 %
Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel (Ethanol) (13 - 14)

General

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel
CY0
Generation
DYB
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Diesel
Fuel Type
Ethanol
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission

Engine

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1798 CC
Engine Capacity
1596 CC
148 bhp
at 4000 rpm
Power
148 bhp
at 5700 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
148 bhp
148 bhp
Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel
300 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
240 NM
at 1600 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
300 NM
240 NM
Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel

Performance

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel
127 mph
Maximum Speed
130 mph
10.1 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
8.6 sec
62 mph 62
mph

140 m
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec

62 mph 62
mph

119 m
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel

▶ REPLAY
10.41 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
9.01 kg/bhp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
10.41 kg/bhp
9.01 kg/bhp
Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel
Fuel Economy
55 mpg
combined
34 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
55 mpg
34 mpg
Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel
45 mpg
city
25 mpg
61 mpg
motorway
43 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
59 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
55 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
719 mi
Range
412 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
719 mi
412 mi
Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel
Environmental Impact
104.9 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
263 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
104.9 kWh
263 kWh
Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
137 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
136 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 Flexifuel
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
430 kg
Maximum Payload
567 kg
288 L
Boot Capacity
363 L
1349 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1148 L