The Comparative Analysis :

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15) vs. Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g (12 - 14)

€ 24,000
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
€ 22,500
 Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g (12 - 14) Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
€ 24,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 22,500

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec is 22.7 cm longer, 6.3 cm narrower and 3.1 cm taller than the Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g.
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
1515
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15)
1760
2044
1484
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g (12 - 14)
1823
2015
1760 mm
Width
1823 mm
2044 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2015 mm
1515 mm
Height
1484 mm
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15)
2635
4585
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g (12 - 14)
2650
4358
4585 mm
Length
4358 mm
2635 mm
Wheelbase
2650 mm

Vehicle Weight

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
1540 kg
Kerb Weight
1350 kg
1970 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
1900 kg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec (10 - 15)
Weight Difference:
190 kg
12.34 %
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g (12 - 14)

General

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
CY0
Generation
DYB
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Diesel
Fuel Type
Diesel
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission

Engine

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
2
4
Cylinders
4
1798 CC
Engine Capacity
1560 CC
148 bhp
at 4000 rpm
Power
104 bhp
at 3600 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
148 bhp
104 bhp
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
300 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
270 NM
at 1750 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
300 NM
270 NM
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g

Performance

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
127 mph
Maximum Speed
116 mph
10.1 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
11.8 sec
62 mph 62
mph

140 m
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec

62 mph 62
mph

164 m
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g

▶ REPLAY
10.41 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
12.98 kg/bhp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
10.41 kg/bhp
12.98 kg/bhp
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
Fuel Economy
55 mpg
combined
76 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
55 mpg
76 mpg
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
45 mpg
city
66 mpg
61 mpg
motorway
83 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
59 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
53 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
719 mi
Range
890 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
719 mi
890 mi
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
Environmental Impact
104.9 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
76.1 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
104.9 kWh
76.1 kWh
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
137 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
99 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 1.8 DI-D+ ClearTec
Ford Focus 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 99g
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
430 kg
Maximum Payload
550 kg
288 L
Boot Capacity
363 L
1349 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1148 L