The Comparative Analysis :

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11) vs. Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Powershift (12 - 14)

€ 36,000
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
€ 21,900
 Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Powershift (12 - 14) Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
€ 36,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 21,900

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo is 8.9 inches longer, 2.5 inches narrower and 1.2 inches taller than the Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT.
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
59.6
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
69.3
80.5
58.4
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Powershift (12 - 14)
71.8
79.3
69.3 in
Width
71.8 in
80.5 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
79.3 in
59.6 in
Height
58.4 in
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
103.7
180.5
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Powershift (12 - 14)
104.3
171.6
180.5 in
Length
171.6 in
103.7 in
Wheelbase
104.3 in

Vehicle Weight

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
No data
Curb Weight
2901 lb
No data
Gross Vehicle
Weight
4023 lb
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
Weight Difference:
No data
No data
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT Powershift (12 - 14)

General

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
CY0
Generation
DYB
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
1.6 L / 78 cu in
237 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
123 hp
at 6300 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
237 hp
123 hp
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
253 lb‑ft
at 2500 rpm
Max. Torque
117 lb‑ft
at 4000 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
253 lb‑ft
117 lb‑ft
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT

Performance

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
137 mph
Maximum Speed
120 mph
7.1 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
11.7 sec
62 mph 62
mph

325 ft
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

62 mph 62
mph

535 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT

▶ REPLAY
No data
Weight-to-Power Ratio
23.59 lb/hp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
0 lb/hp
23.59 lb/hp
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Fuel Economy
23 mpg
combined
37 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
23 mpg
37 mpg
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
17 mpg
city
27 mpg
29 mpg
highway
48 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
15.6 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
14.5 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
359 mi
Range
542 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
359 mi
542 mi
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Environmental Impact
193.3 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
119.4 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
193.3 kWh
119.4 kWh
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
Euro 4 / Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
391 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
235 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
No data
Maximum Payload
1122 lb
8.2 cu ft
Trunk Volume
10.3 cu ft
38.2 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
32.5 cu ft