The Comparative Analysis :

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11) vs. Volvo C30 2.0D Powershift Geartronic (09 - 10)

€ 36,000
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
€ 26,200
 Volvo C30 2.0D Powershift Geartronic (09 - 10) Volvo C30 2.0D
€ 36,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 26,200

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo is 31.9 cm longer, 2.2 cm narrower and 6.8 cm taller than the Volvo C30 2.0D.
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Volvo C30 2.0D
1515
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
1760
2044
1447
Blueprint Volvo C30 2.0D Powershift Geartronic (09 - 10)
1782
2039
1760 mm
Width
1782 mm
2044 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2039 mm
1515 mm
Height
1447 mm
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
2635
4585
Blueprint Volvo C30 2.0D Powershift Geartronic (09 - 10)
2640
4266
4585 mm
Length
4266 mm
2635 mm
Wheelbase
2640 mm

Vehicle Weight

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Volvo C30 2.0D
No data
Kerb Weight
1437 kg
No data
Gross Vehicle
Weight
1840 kg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
Weight Difference:
No data
No data
Volvo C30 2.0D Powershift Geartronic (09 - 10)

General

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Volvo C30 2.0D
CY0
Generation
M
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Diesel
Permanent all-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Volvo C30 2.0D
Straight-four petrol engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Code
D4204T
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1998 CC
Engine Capacity
1997 CC
237 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Power
134 bhp
at 4000 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
237 bhp
134 bhp
Volvo C30 2.0D
343 NM
at 2500 rpm
Max. Torque
320 NM
at 2000 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
343 NM
320 NM
Volvo C30 2.0D

Performance

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Volvo C30 2.0D
137 mph
Maximum Speed
127 mph
7.1 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
9.5 sec
62 mph 62
mph

99 m
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

62 mph 62
mph

132 m
0.000 sec

Volvo C30 2.0D

▶ REPLAY
No data
Weight-to-Power Ratio
10.72 kg/bhp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
0 kg/bhp
10.72 kg/bhp
Volvo C30 2.0D

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Volvo C30 2.0D
Fuel Economy
28 mpg
combined
48 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
28 mpg
48 mpg
Volvo C30 2.0D
20 mpg
city
37 mpg
35 mpg
motorway
58 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
59 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
52 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
359 mi
Range
547 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
359 mi
547 mi
Volvo C30 2.0D
Environmental Impact
193.3 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
121.3 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
193.3 kWh
121.3 kWh
Volvo C30 2.0D
Euro 4 / Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 4
243 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
156 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Volvo C30 2.0D
5
Doors
3
5
No. of Seats
4
No data
Maximum Payload
403 kg
288 L
Boot Capacity
278 L
1349 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
921 L