The Comparative Analysis :

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D (08 - 10) vs. Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG (Autogas) (12 - 14)

€ 21,500
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D (08 - 10) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
€ 23,100
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG (Autogas) (12 - 14) Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
€ 21,500
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 23,100

Base price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D is 8.9 inches longer, 2.5 inches narrower and 1.2 inches taller than the Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG.
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
59.6
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D (08 - 10)
69.3
80.5
58.4
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG (Autogas) (12 - 14)
71.8
79.3
69.3 in
Width
71.8 in
80.5 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
79.3 in
59.6 in
Height
58.4 in
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D (08 - 10)
103.7
180.5
Blueprint Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG (Autogas) (12 - 14)
104.3
171.6
180.5 in
Length
171.6 in
103.7 in
Wheelbase
104.3 in

Vehicle Weight

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
3395 lb
Curb Weight
No data
4343 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
No data
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D (08 - 10)
Weight Difference:
No data
No data
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG (Autogas) (12 - 14)

General

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
CY0
Generation
DYB
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Diesel
Fuel Type
Autogas (LPG)
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
5-speed manual transmission

Engine

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
1.6 L / 78 cu in
138 hp
at 4000 rpm
Power
115 hp
at 6400 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
138 hp
115 hp
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
229 lb‑ft
at 1750 rpm
Max. Torque
103 lb‑ft
at 4200 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
229 lb‑ft
103 lb‑ft
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG

Performance

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
127 mph
Maximum Speed
120 mph
9.6 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.1 sec
62 mph 62
mph

436 ft
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D

62 mph 62
mph

551 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG

 REPLAY
24.6 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
No data
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
24.6 lb/hp
0 lb/hp
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
Fuel Economy
37 mpg
combined
31 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
37 mpg
31 mpg
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
28 mpg
city
22 mpg
46 mpg
highway
42 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
15.6 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
10.8 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
582 mi
Range
335 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
582 mi
335 mi
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
Environmental Impact
129.6 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
112 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
129.6 kWh
112 kWh
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 5
266 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
196 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 DI-D
Ford Focus 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
948 lb
Maximum Payload
No data
8.2 cu ft
Trunk Volume
10.3 cu ft
38.2 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
32.5 cu ft