The Comparative Analysis :

Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI 4x4 DSG (17 - 18) vs. Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)

€ 38,800
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI 4x4 DSG (17 - 18) Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI
€ 40,100
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
€ 38,800
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 40,100

Base price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI is slightly bigger in every dimension. It's 2.4 inches longer, 3 inches wider and 0.6 inches taller than the Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP.
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
66.3
Blueprint Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI 4x4 DSG (17 - 18)
74.1
82.2
65.7
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
71.1
81.6
74.1 in
Width
71.1 in
82.2 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
81.6 in
66.3 in
Height
65.7 in
Blueprint Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI 4x4 DSG (17 - 18)
109.8
185.2
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
105.1
182.9
185.2 in
Length
182.9 in
109.8 in
Wheelbase
105.1 in

Vehicle Weight

Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
3737 lb
Curb Weight
4068 lb
5060 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
5313 lb
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI 4x4 DSG (17 - 18)
Weight Difference:
331 lb
8.14 %
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)

General

Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
NS
Generation
V
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Diesel
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
Drivetrain
On-demand four-wheel drive (4WD) with engagement by the vehicle's operator
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with two tur­bo­chargers (bi­turbo)
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
2.2 L / 108 cu in
178 hp
at 3900 rpm
Power
154 hp
at 4000 rpm
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI
178 hp
154 hp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
236 lb‑ft
at 1400 rpm
Max. Torque
280 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI
236 lb‑ft
280 lb‑ft
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

Performance

Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
129 mph
Maximum Speed
123 mph
8 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.5 sec
62 mph 62
mph

364 ft
0.000 sec

Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI

62 mph 62
mph

571 ft
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

 REPLAY
20.99 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
26.42 lb/hp
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI
20.99 lb/hp
26.42 lb/hp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Fuel Economy
32 mpg
combined
32 mpg
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI
32 mpg
32 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
26 mpg
city
26 mpg
37 mpg
highway
39 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
16.6 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
15.9 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
529 mi
Range
511 mi
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI
529 mi
511 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Environmental Impact
140.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
150.2 kWh
Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI
140.2 kWh
150.2 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
Emission Standard
Euro 4
274 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
309 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Skoda Kodiaq Scout 2.0 TSI
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
7
1323 lb
Maximum Payload
1246 lb
18.4 cu ft
Trunk Volume
5.2 cu ft
58.5 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
47.7 cu ft