The Comparative Analysis :

Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11) vs. Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 (09 - 12)

€ 36,300
Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11) Volvo XC60 2.0T
€ 30,000
 Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 (09 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
€ 36,300
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 30,000

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Volvo XC60 2.0T is 1.8 cm shorter, 8.6 cm wider and 4.3 cm taller than the Citroen C-Crosser 2.4.
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
1713
Blueprint Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)
1891
2120
1670
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 (09 - 12)
1805
2072
1891 mm
Width
1805 mm
2120 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2072 mm
1713 mm
Height
1670 mm
Blueprint Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)
2774
4627
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 (09 - 12)
2670
4645
4627 mm
Length
4645 mm
2774 mm
Wheelbase
2670 mm

Vehicle Weight

Volvo XC60 2.0T
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
1833 kg
Kerb Weight
1650 kg
2270 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
2290 kg
Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)
Weight Difference:
183 kg
9.98 %
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 (09 - 12)

General

Volvo XC60 2.0T
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
D
Generation
V
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
On-demand four-wheel drive with engagement by the vehicle's operator
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
5-speed manual transmission

Engine

Volvo XC60 2.0T
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Straight-four petrol engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
B4204T6
Engine Code
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1999 CC
Engine Capacity
2360 CC
200 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Power
168 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Volvo XC60 2.0T
200 bhp
168 bhp
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
300 NM
at 1750 rpm
Max. Torque
232 NM
at 4100 rpm
Volvo XC60 2.0T
300 NM
232 NM
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4

Performance

Volvo XC60 2.0T
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
127 mph
Maximum Speed
118 mph
8.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
10.4 sec
62 mph 62
mph

124 m
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 2.0T

62 mph 62
mph

144 m
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4

▶ REPLAY
9.17 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
9.82 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 2.0T
9.17 kg/bhp
9.82 kg/bhp
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Volvo XC60 2.0T
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Fuel Economy
33 mpg
combined
30 mpg
Volvo XC60 2.0T
33 mpg
30 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
25 mpg
city
22 mpg
41 mpg
motorway
37 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
70 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
60 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
512 mi
Range
396 mi
Volvo XC60 2.0T
512 mi
396 mi
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Environmental Impact
161.1 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
178.2 kWh
Volvo XC60 2.0T
161.1 kWh
178.2 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 4
198 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
224 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Volvo XC60 2.0T
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
437 kg
Maximum Payload
640 kg
495 L
Boot Capacity
441 L
1455 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1686 L