The Comparative Analysis :

Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11) vs. Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)

€ 36,300
Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11) Volvo XC60 2.0T
€ 40,100
 Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
€ 36,300
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 40,100

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Volvo XC60 2.0T is 0.7 inches shorter, 3.4 inches wider and 1.7 inches taller than the Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP.
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
67.4
Blueprint Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)
74.4
83.5
65.7
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
71.1
81.6
74.4 in
Width
71.1 in
83.5 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
81.6 in
67.4 in
Height
65.7 in
Blueprint Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)
109.2
182.2
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
105.1
182.9
182.2 in
Length
182.9 in
109.2 in
Wheelbase
105.1 in

Vehicle Weight

Volvo XC60 2.0T
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
4041 lb
Curb Weight
4068 lb
5004 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
5313 lb
Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)
Weight Difference:
26 lb
0.64 %
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)

General

Volvo XC60 2.0T
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
D
Generation
V
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Diesel
Front-wheel drive
Drivetrain
On-demand four-wheel drive (4WD) with engagement by the vehicle's operator
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Volvo XC60 2.0T
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with two tur­bo­chargers (bi­turbo)
B4204T6
Engine Code
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
2.2 L / 108 cu in
200 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
154 hp
at 4000 rpm
Volvo XC60 2.0T
200 hp
154 hp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
221 lb‑ft
at 1750 rpm
Max. Torque
280 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Volvo XC60 2.0T
221 lb‑ft
280 lb‑ft
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

Performance

Volvo XC60 2.0T
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
127 mph
Maximum Speed
123 mph
8.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.5 sec
62 mph 62
mph

407 ft
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 2.0T

62 mph 62
mph

571 ft
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

▶ REPLAY
20.21 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
26.42 lb/hp
Volvo XC60 2.0T
20.21 lb/hp
26.42 lb/hp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Volvo XC60 2.0T
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Fuel Economy
28 mpg
combined
32 mpg
Volvo XC60 2.0T
28 mpg
32 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
21 mpg
city
26 mpg
34 mpg
highway
39 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
18.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
15.9 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
512 mi
Range
511 mi
Volvo XC60 2.0T
512 mi
511 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Environmental Impact
161.1 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
150.2 kWh
Volvo XC60 2.0T
161.1 kWh
150.2 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 4
319 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
309 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Volvo XC60 2.0T
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
7
963 lb
Maximum Payload
1246 lb
14 cu ft
Trunk Volume
5.2 cu ft
41.2 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
47.7 cu ft