The Comparative Analysis :
Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11) vs. Mercedes EQC 400 4MATIC (19 - ..)
€ 36,300

€ 71,300

€ 36,300
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 71,300
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Volvo XC60 2.0T is 13.5 cm shorter, 0.7 cm wider and 8.9 cm taller than the Mercedes EQC 400.
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Mercedes EQC 400
1713
1891
2120
1624
1884
2096
1891 mm
Width
1884 mm
2120 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2096 mm
1713 mm
Height
1624 mm
2774
4627
2873
4762
4627 mm
Length
4762 mm
2774 mm
Wheelbase
2873 mm
Vehicle Weight
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Mercedes EQC 400
1833 kg
Kerb Weight
2495 kg
2270 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2940 kg

Weight Difference:
662 kg
26.53 %

General
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Mercedes EQC 400
D
Generation
N293
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Electricity

Front-wheel drive
Drive
Permanent all-wheel drive

6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
1-speed automatic transmission
Engine
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Mercedes EQC 400
Straight-four petrol engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Asynchronous motor
B4204T6
Engine Code
4
Valves
0
4
Cylinders
0
1999 CC
Engine Capacity
0 CC
200 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Power
402 bhp
at 0 rpm
Volvo XC60 2.0T
200 bhp
402 bhp
Mercedes EQC 400
300 NM
at 1750 rpm
Max. Torque
760 NM
at 0 rpm
Volvo XC60 2.0T
300 NM
760 NM
Mercedes EQC 400
Performance
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Mercedes EQC 400
127 mph
Maximum Speed
112 mph
8.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
5.1 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
124 m
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 2.0T
62 mph
62
mph
mph
71 m
0.000 sec

Mercedes EQC 400
▶ REPLAY
9.17 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
6.21 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 2.0T
9.17 kg/bhp
6.21 kg/bhp
Mercedes EQC 400
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Mercedes EQC 400
Fuel Economy
33 mpg
combined ✽ per 100 miles
32 kWh✽
( 126 MPGe ⓘ Miles per gallon petrol equivalent (MPGe) is a measure of the average distance traveled per unit of energy consumed. MPGe, specified in miles per imperial gallon (~4.546 litres), is used to compare the energy consumption of vehicles that use different energy sources.)
Volvo XC60 2.0T
33 mpg
126 MPGe
Mercedes EQC 400
25 mpg
city
No data
41 mpg
motorway
No data
70 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
80 kWh
512 mi
Range
252 mi
Volvo XC60 2.0T
512 mi
252 mi
Mercedes EQC 400
Environmental Impact
161.1 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
64.1 kWh
Volvo XC60 2.0T
161.1 kWh
64.1 kWh
Mercedes EQC 400
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Elektrofahrzeug
198 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
0 g/km (WLTP)
Practical Convenience
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Mercedes EQC 400
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
437 kg
Maximum Payload
445 kg
495 L
Boot Capacity
500 L










1455 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1460 L