The Comparative Analysis :
Volvo XC60 2.4D AWD Geartronic (08 - 10) vs. Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
€ 38,000
€ 40,100
€ 38,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 40,100
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Volvo XC60 2.4D is 0.7 inches shorter, 3.4 inches wider and 1.7 inches taller than the Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP.
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
67.4
74.4
83.5
65.7
71.1
81.6
74.4 in
Width
71.1 in
83.5 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
81.6 in
67.4 in
Height
65.7 in
109.2
182.2
105.1
182.9
182.2 in
Length
182.9 in
109.2 in
Wheelbase
105.1 in
Vehicle Weight
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
3986 lb
Curb Weight
4068 lb
5523 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
5313 lb
Weight Difference:
82 lb
2.02 %
General
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
D
Generation
V
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Diesel
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
Drivetrain
On-demand four-wheel drive (4WD) with engagement by the vehicle's operator
6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Engine
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Straight-five diesel engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with two turbochargers (biturbo)
D5244T5
Engine Code
4
Valves
4
5
Cylinders
4
2.4 L / 117 cu in
Displacement
2.2 L / 108 cu in
161 hp
at 4000 rpm
Power
154 hp
at 4000 rpm
Volvo XC60 2.4D
161 hp
154 hp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
310 lb‑ft
at 1500 rpm
Max. Torque
280 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Volvo XC60 2.4D
310 lb‑ft
280 lb‑ft
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Performance
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
124 mph
Maximum Speed
123 mph
10.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.5 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
495 ft
0.000 sec
Volvo XC60 2.4D
62 mph
62
mph
mph
571 ft
0.000 sec
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
▶ REPLAY
24.76 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
26.42 lb/hp
Volvo XC60 2.4D
24.76 lb/hp
26.42 lb/hp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Fuel Economy
31 mpg
combined
32 mpg
Volvo XC60 2.4D
31 mpg
32 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
23 mpg
city
26 mpg
39 mpg
highway
39 mpg
18.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
15.9 gal
580 mi
Range
511 mi
Volvo XC60 2.4D
580 mi
511 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Environmental Impact
154.3 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
150.2 kWh
Volvo XC60 2.4D
154.3 kWh
150.2 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Euro 4 III
Emission Standard
Euro 4
320 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
309 g/mi (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
7
1537 lb
Maximum Payload
1246 lb
14 cu ft
Trunk Volume
5.2 cu ft
41.2 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
47.7 cu ft
