The Comparative Analysis :

Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance (18 - 20) vs. Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)

€ 46,200
Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance (18 - 20) Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance
€ 40,100
 Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
€ 46,200
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 40,100

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance is 4.3 cm longer, 9.7 cm wider and 1.2 cm lower than the Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP.
Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
1658
Blueprint Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance (18 - 20)
1902
2117
1670
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
1805
2072
1902 mm
Width
1805 mm
2117 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2072 mm
1658 mm
Height
1670 mm
Blueprint Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance (18 - 20)
2865
4688
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
2670
4645
4688 mm
Length
4645 mm
2865 mm
Wheelbase
2670 mm

Vehicle Weight

Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
1764 kg
Kerb Weight
1845 kg
2370 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
2410 kg
Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance (18 - 20)
Weight Difference:
81 kg
4.39 %
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)

General

Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
U
Generation
V
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Diesel
Front-wheel drive
Drive
On-demand four-wheel drive with engagement by the vehicle's operator
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with two tur­bo­chargers (bi­turbo)
D4204T14
Engine Code
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1969 CC
Engine Capacity
2179 CC
197 bhp
at 4250 rpm
Power
154 bhp
at 4000 rpm
Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance
197 bhp
154 bhp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
440 NM
at 1750 rpm
Max. Torque
380 NM
at 2000 rpm
Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance
440 NM
380 NM
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

Performance

Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
127 mph
Maximum Speed
123 mph
8.8 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.5 sec
62 mph 62
mph

122 m
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance

62 mph 62
mph

174 m
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

▶ REPLAY
8.95 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
11.98 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance
8.95 kg/bhp
11.98 kg/bhp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Fuel Economy
58 mpg
combined
39 mpg
Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance
58 mpg
39 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
49 mpg
city
31 mpg
64 mpg
motorway
46 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
71 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
60 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
900 mi
Range
511 mi
Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance
900 mi
511 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Environmental Impact
100.7 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
150.2 kWh
Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance
100.7 kWh
150.2 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Euro 6d-TEMP
Emission Standard
Euro 4
153 g/km (WLTP)
CO2 Emissions
192 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Volvo XC60 D4 Polestar Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
7
606 kg
Maximum Payload
565 kg
505 L
Boot Capacity
184 L
1432 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1686 L