The Comparative Analysis :

Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (15 - 16) vs. Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..)

€ 43,400
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (15 - 16) Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
€ 35,700
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..) Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
€ 43,400
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 35,700

Base price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance is slightly bigger in every dimension. It's 4.4 cm longer, 3.6 cm wider and 3.4 cm taller than the Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid.
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
1713
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (15 - 16)
1891
2120
1679
Blueprint Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..)
1855
2117
1891 mm
Width
1855 mm
2120 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2117 mm
1713 mm
Height
1679 mm
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (15 - 16)
2774
4644
Blueprint Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..)
2663
4600
4644 mm
Length
4600 mm
2774 mm
Wheelbase
2663 mm

Vehicle Weight

Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
1834 kg
Kerb Weight
1614 kg
2505 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
2240 kg
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance Geartronic (15 - 16)
Weight Difference:
220 kg
12 %
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid 2WD e-CVT (19 - ..)

General

Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
D
Generation
RW
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
8-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
Continuously variable transmission (CVT)

Engine

Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Straight-four petrol engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
4-cylinder full hybrid petrol engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
B4204T11
Engine Code
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1969 CC
Engine Capacity
1993 CC
250 bhp
at 5500 rpm
Power
181 bhp
at 0 rpm
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
250 bhp
181 bhp
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
400 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
315 NM
at 0 rpm
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
400 NM
315 NM
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid

Performance

Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
130 mph
Maximum Speed
112 mph
7.1 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
8.8 sec
62 mph 62
mph

99 m
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance

62 mph 62
mph

122 m
0.000 sec

Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid

 REPLAY
7.34 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
8.92 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
7.34 kg/bhp
8.92 kg/bhp
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Fuel Economy
42 mpg
combined
53 mpg
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
42 mpg
53 mpg
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
32 mpg
city
56 mpg
51 mpg
motorway
52 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
70 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
57 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
649 mi
Range
668 mi
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
649 mi
668 mi
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Environmental Impact
127 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
100.4 kWh
Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
127 kWh
100.4 kWh
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP (WLTP) 36AG-AI
157 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
120 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Volvo XC60 T5 Polestar Performance
Honda CR-V 2.0 i-MMD Hybrid
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
671 kg
Maximum Payload
626 kg
495 L
Boot Capacity
497 L
1455 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1694 L