The Comparative Analysis :
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine AWD Geartronic (18 - 20) vs. Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 (09 - 12)
€ 67,500

€ 30,000

€ 67,500
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 30,000
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine is 4.3 cm longer, 9.7 cm wider and 1.2 cm lower than the Citroen C-Crosser 2.4.
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
1658
1902
2117
1670
1805
2072
1902 mm
Width
1805 mm
2117 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2072 mm
1658 mm
Height
1670 mm
2865
4688
2670
4645
4688 mm
Length
4645 mm
2865 mm
Wheelbase
2670 mm
Vehicle Weight
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
2223 kg
Kerb Weight
1650 kg
2660 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2290 kg

Weight Difference:
573 kg
25.78 %

General
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
U
Generation
V
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)

On-demand four-wheel drive with automatic engagement
Drive
On-demand four-wheel drive with engagement by the vehicle's operator

8-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
5-speed manual transmission
Engine
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
4-cylinder plug-in hybrid petrol engine with gas turbine compressor
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine (naturally aspirated engine)
B4204T34
Engine Code
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1969 CC
Engine Capacity
2360 CC
387 bhp
at 0 rpm
Power
168 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
387 bhp
168 bhp
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
640 NM
at 0 rpm
Max. Torque
232 NM
at 4100 rpm
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
640 NM
232 NM
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Performance
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
143 mph
Maximum Speed
118 mph
5.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
10.4 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
76 m
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
62 mph
62
mph
mph
144 m
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
▶ REPLAY
5.74 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
9.82 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
5.74 kg/bhp
9.82 kg/bhp
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Fuel Economy
128 mpg
combined
30 mpg
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
128 mpg
30 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
No data
city
22 mpg
No data
motorway
37 mpg
50 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
60 L
1412 mi
Range
396 mi
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
1412 mi
396 mi
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Environmental Impact
41.7 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
178.2 kWh
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
41.7 kWh
178.2 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Euro 6d-TEMP
Emission Standard
Euro 4
67 g/km (WLTP)
CO2 Emissions
224 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
437 kg
Maximum Payload
640 kg
505 L
Boot Capacity
441 L








1432 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1686 L