The Comparative Analysis :
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Engineered AWD Geartronic (19 - 20) vs. Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12)
€ 84,600

€ 37,500

€ 84,600
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 37,500
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine is 4.3 cm longer, 9.7 cm wider and 1.2 cm lower than the Citroen C-Crosser 2.4.
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
1658
1902
2117
1670
1805
2072
1902 mm
Width
1805 mm
2117 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2072 mm
1658 mm
Height
1670 mm
2865
4688
2670
4645
4688 mm
Length
4645 mm
2865 mm
Wheelbase
2670 mm
Vehicle Weight
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
2215 kg
Kerb Weight
1715 kg
2660 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2290 kg

Weight Difference:
500 kg
22.57 %

General
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
U
Generation
V
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)

On-demand four-wheel drive with automatic engagement
Drive
On-demand four-wheel drive with engagement by the vehicle's operator

8-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
Continuously variable transmission (CVT)
Engine
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
4-cylinder plug-in hybrid petrol engine with gas turbine compressor
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine (naturally aspirated engine)
B4204T48
Engine Code
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1969 CC
Engine Capacity
2360 CC
399 bhp
at 0 rpm
Power
168 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
399 bhp
168 bhp
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
670 NM
at 0 rpm
Max. Torque
232 NM
at 4100 rpm
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
670 NM
232 NM
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Performance
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
143 mph
Maximum Speed
118 mph
5.4 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
11.7 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
75 m
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
62 mph
62
mph
mph
163 m
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
▶ REPLAY
5.55 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
10.21 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
5.55 kg/bhp
10.21 kg/bhp
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Fuel Economy
128 mpg
combined
31 mpg
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
128 mpg
31 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
No data
city
23 mpg
No data
motorway
39 mpg
70 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
60 L
1977 mi
Range
409 mi
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
1977 mi
409 mi
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Environmental Impact
41.7 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
172.4 kWh
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
41.7 kWh
172.4 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP-ISC (WLTP) 36CH, 36CI, 36DG
Emission Standard
Euro 4
65 g/km (WLTP)
CO2 Emissions
216 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
7
445 kg
Maximum Payload
575 kg
505 L
Boot Capacity
184 L







1432 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1686 L