The Comparative Analysis :

Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Engineered AWD Geartronic (19 - 20) vs. Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)

€ 84,600
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Engineered AWD Geartronic (19 - 20) Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
€ 40,100
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
€ 84,600
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 40,100

Base price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine is 1.7 inches longer, 3.8 inches wider and 0.5 inches lower than the Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP.
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
65.3
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Engineered AWD Geartronic (19 - 20)
74.9
83.3
65.7
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
71.1
81.6
74.9 in
Width
71.1 in
83.3 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
81.6 in
65.3 in
Height
65.7 in
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Engineered AWD Geartronic (19 - 20)
112.8
184.6
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
105.1
182.9
184.6 in
Length
182.9 in
112.8 in
Wheelbase
105.1 in

Vehicle Weight

Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
4883 lb
Curb Weight
4068 lb
5864 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
5313 lb
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Engineered AWD Geartronic (19 - 20)
Weight Difference:
816 lb
16.71 %
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)

General

Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
U
Generation
V
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Diesel
On-demand four-wheel drive (4WD) with automatic engagement
Drivetrain
On-demand four-wheel drive (4WD) with engagement by the vehicle's operator
8-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
4-cylinder plug-in hybrid gasoline engine with gas turbine com­pres­sor
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with two tur­bo­chargers (bi­turbo)
B4204T48
Engine Code
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
2.2 L / 108 cu in
399 hp
at 0 rpm
Power
154 hp
at 4000 rpm
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
399 hp
154 hp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
494 lb‑ft
at 0 rpm
Max. Torque
280 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
494 lb‑ft
280 lb‑ft
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

Performance

Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
143 mph
Maximum Speed
123 mph
5.4 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.5 sec
62 mph 62
mph

246 ft
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine

62 mph 62
mph

571 ft
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

 REPLAY
12.24 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
26.42 lb/hp
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
12.24 lb/hp
26.42 lb/hp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Fuel Economy
107 mpg
combined
32 mpg
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
107 mpg
32 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
No data
city
26 mpg
No data
highway
39 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
18.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
15.9 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
1977 mi
Range
511 mi
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
1977 mi
511 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Environmental Impact
41.7 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
150.2 kWh
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
41.7 kWh
150.2 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP-ISC (WLTP) 36CH, 36CI, 36DG
Emission Standard
Euro 4
105 g/mi (WLTP)
CO2 Emissions
309 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
7
981 lb
Maximum Payload
1246 lb
14.3 cu ft
Trunk Volume
5.2 cu ft
40.5 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
47.7 cu ft