The Comparative Analysis :
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance AWD Geartronic (18 - 20) vs. Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
€ 72,200
€ 40,100
€ 72,200
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 40,100
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance is 4.3 cm longer, 9.7 cm wider and 1.2 cm lower than the Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP.
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
1658
1902
2117
1670
1805
2072
1902 mm
Width
1805 mm
2117 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2072 mm
1658 mm
Height
1670 mm
2865
4688
2670
4645
4688 mm
Length
4645 mm
2865 mm
Wheelbase
2670 mm
Vehicle Weight
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
2223 kg
Kerb Weight
1845 kg
2660 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2410 kg
Weight Difference:
378 kg
17 %
General
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
U
Generation
V
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Diesel
On-demand four-wheel drive with automatic engagement
Drive
On-demand four-wheel drive with engagement by the vehicle's operator
8-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Engine
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
4-cylinder plug-in hybrid petrol engine with gas turbine compressor
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with two turbochargers (biturbo)
B4204T48
Engine Code
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1969 CC
Engine Capacity
2179 CC
399 bhp
at 0 rpm
Power
154 bhp
at 4000 rpm
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance
399 bhp
154 bhp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
670 NM
at 0 rpm
Max. Torque
380 NM
at 2000 rpm
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance
670 NM
380 NM
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Performance
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
143 mph
Maximum Speed
123 mph
5.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.5 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
76 m
0.000 sec
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance
62 mph
62
mph
mph
174 m
0.000 sec
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
▶ REPLAY
5.57 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
11.98 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance
5.57 kg/bhp
11.98 kg/bhp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Fuel Economy
123 mpg
combined
39 mpg
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance
123 mpg
39 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
No data
city
31 mpg
No data
motorway
46 mpg
50 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
60 L
1351 mi
Range
511 mi
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance
1351 mi
511 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Environmental Impact
43.6 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
150.2 kWh
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance
43.6 kWh
150.2 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Euro 6d-TEMP
Emission Standard
Euro 4
67 g/km (WLTP)
CO2 Emissions
192 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Volvo XC60 T8 Twin Engine Polestar Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
7
437 kg
Maximum Payload
565 kg
505 L
Boot Capacity
184 L
1432 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1686 L
