The Comparative Analysis :

VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI 4MOTION DSG (17 - 18) vs. Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175 AWD Automatic (12 - 15)

€ 30,800
VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI 4MOTION DSG (17 - 18) VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI
€ 38,100
 Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175 AWD Automatic (12 - 15) Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175
€ 30,800
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 38,100

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI is considerably smaller in every dimension. It's 12.6 inches shorter, 0.8 inches narrower and 3.8 inches lower than the Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175.
VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175
61.9
Blueprint VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI 4MOTION DSG (17 - 18)
71.6
78.4
65.7
Blueprint Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175 AWD Automatic (12 - 15)
72.4
84.3
71.6 in
Width
72.4 in
78.4 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
84.3 in
61.9 in
Height
65.7 in
Blueprint VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI 4MOTION DSG (17 - 18)
102.1
166.7
Blueprint Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175 AWD Automatic (12 - 15)
106.3
179.3
166.7 in
Length
179.3 in
102.1 in
Wheelbase
106.3 in

Vehicle Weight

VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175
3296 lb
Curb Weight
3450 lb
4387 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
4674 lb
VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI 4MOTION DSG (17 - 18)
Weight Difference:
154 lb
4.46 %
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175 AWD Automatic (12 - 15)

General

VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175
A1
Generation
GH
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Diesel
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
Drivetrain
On-demand four-wheel drive (4WD) with automatic engagement
7-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
6-speed automatic transmission

Engine

VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
*DKZ*
Engine Code
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
2.2 L / 108 cu in
187 hp
at 4200 rpm
Power
173 hp
at 4500 rpm
VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI
187 hp
173 hp
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175
236 lb‑ft
at 1500 rpm
Max. Torque
310 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI
236 lb‑ft
310 lb‑ft
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175

Performance

VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175
134 mph
Maximum Speed
127 mph
7.2 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
9.4 sec
62 mph 62
mph

328 ft
0.000 sec

VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI

62 mph 62
mph

430 ft
0.000 sec

Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175

▶ REPLAY
17.63 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
19.94 lb/hp
VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI
17.63 lb/hp
19.94 lb/hp
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175

Fuel Economy / Emissions

VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175
Fuel Economy
35 mpg
combined
43 mpg
VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI
35 mpg
43 mpg
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175
28 mpg
city
37 mpg
41 mpg
highway
48 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
14.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
15.3 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
510 mi
Range
656 mi
VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI
510 mi
656 mi
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175
Environmental Impact
127 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
113.1 kWh
VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI
127 kWh
113.1 kWh
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175
Euro 6c (NEFZ) 36ZA-ZF
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
246 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
232 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

VW T-Roc 2.0 TSI
Mazda CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
1091 lb
Maximum Payload
1224 lb
11.1 cu ft
Trunk Volume
14.2 cu ft
35 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
45.9 cu ft