The Comparative Analysis :
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo (12 - 18) vs. KIA Optima 2.0 (16 - 18)
€ 37,500

€ 25,100

€ 37,500
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 25,100
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo is considerably smaller in every dimension. It's 21.1 cm shorter, 5.5 cm narrower and 3.8 cm lower than the KIA Optima 2.0.
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
1427
1805
2005
1465
1860
2120
1805 mm
Width
1860 mm
2005 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2120 mm
1427 mm
Height
1465 mm
2775
4644
2805
4855
4644 mm
Length
4855 mm
2775 mm
Wheelbase
2805 mm
Vehicle Weight
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
1559 kg
Kerb Weight
1530 kg
No data
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
2000 kg

Weight Difference:
29 kg
1.86 %

General
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
ATS
Generation
JF
Saloon
Car Body Style
Saloon
Super Unleaded (98 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)

Rear-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive

6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission
Engine
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
Straight-four petrol engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine (naturally aspirated engine)
GM 2.0L Ecotec Turbo I4
Engine Series
LTG
Engine Code

4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1998 CC
Engine Capacity
1999 CC
272 bhp
at 5500 rpm
Power
161 bhp
at 6500 rpm
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
272 bhp
161 bhp
KIA Optima 2.0
353 NM
at 1700 rpm
Max. Torque
196 NM
at 4800 rpm
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
353 NM
196 NM
KIA Optima 2.0
Performance
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
149 mph
Maximum Speed
130 mph
5.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
9.4 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
82 m
0.000 sec

Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
62 mph
62
mph
mph
131 m
0.000 sec

KIA Optima 2.0
▶ REPLAY
5.73 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
9.5 kg/bhp
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
5.73 kg/bhp
9.5 kg/bhp
KIA Optima 2.0
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
Fuel Economy
33 mpg
combined
38 mpg
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
33 mpg
38 mpg
KIA Optima 2.0
24 mpg
city
28 mpg
No data
motorway
48 mpg
63 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
70 L
455 mi
Range
588 mi
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
455 mi
588 mi
KIA Optima 2.0
Environmental Impact
162.9 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
140.2 kWh
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
162.9 kWh
140.2 kWh
KIA Optima 2.0
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
199 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
173 g/km (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
No data
Maximum Payload
470 kg
381 L
Boot Capacity
510 L







No data
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
No data