The Comparative Analysis :
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo (12 - 18) vs. KIA Optima 2.0 (16 - 18)
€ 37,500
€ 25,100
€ 37,500
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 25,100
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo is considerably smaller in every dimension. It's 8.3 inches shorter, 2.2 inches narrower and 1.5 inches lower than the KIA Optima 2.0.
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
56.2
71.1
78.9
57.7
73.2
83.5
71.1 in
Width
73.2 in
78.9 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
83.5 in
56.2 in
Height
57.7 in
109.3
182.8
110.4
191.1
182.8 in
Length
191.1 in
109.3 in
Wheelbase
110.4 in
Vehicle Weight
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
3437 lb
Curb Weight
3373 lb
No data
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
4409 lb
Weight Difference:
64 lb
1.86 %
General
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
ATS
Generation
JF
Sedan
Car Body Style
Sedan
Premium Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Rear-wheel drive
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission
Engine
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
Straight-four gasoline engine with turbocharger
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine (naturally aspirated engine)
GM 2.0L Ecotec Turbo I4
Engine Series
LTG
Engine Code
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
272 hp
at 5500 rpm
Power
161 hp
at 6500 rpm
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
272 hp
161 hp
KIA Optima 2.0
260 lb‑ft
at 1700 rpm
Max. Torque
145 lb‑ft
at 4800 rpm
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
260 lb‑ft
145 lb‑ft
KIA Optima 2.0
Performance
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
149 mph
Maximum Speed
130 mph
5.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
9.4 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
269 ft
0.000 sec
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
62 mph
62
mph
mph
430 ft
0.000 sec
KIA Optima 2.0
▶ REPLAY
12.64 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
20.95 lb/hp
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
12.64 lb/hp
20.95 lb/hp
KIA Optima 2.0
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
Fuel Economy
27 mpg
combined
32 mpg
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
27 mpg
32 mpg
KIA Optima 2.0
20 mpg
city
24 mpg
No data
highway
40 mpg
16.6 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
18.5 gal
455 mi
Range
588 mi
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
455 mi
588 mi
KIA Optima 2.0
Environmental Impact
162.9 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
140.2 kWh
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
162.9 kWh
140.2 kWh
KIA Optima 2.0
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
320 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
278 g/mi (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Cadillac ATS 2.0 Turbo
KIA Optima 2.0
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
No data
Maximum Payload
1036 lb
10.8 cu ft
Trunk Volume
14.4 cu ft
No data
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
No data
