The Comparative Analysis :

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD Automatic (13 - 14) vs. Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG (12 - 15)

€ 26,400
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD Automatic (13 - 14) Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
€ 23,900
 Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG (12 - 15) Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
€ 26,400
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 23,900

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD is 27.2 cm longer, 0.8 cm wider and 0.1 cm lower than the Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG.
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
1625
Blueprint Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD Automatic (13 - 14)
1836
2165
1626
Blueprint Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG (12 - 15)
1828
2067
1836 mm
Width
1828 mm
2165 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2067 mm
1625 mm
Height
1626 mm
Blueprint Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD Automatic (13 - 14)
2760
4652
Blueprint Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG (12 - 15)
2648
4380
4652 mm
Length
4380 mm
2760 mm
Wheelbase
2648 mm

Vehicle Weight

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
1659 kg
Kerb Weight
1374 kg
2309 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
1860 kg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD Automatic (13 - 14)
Weight Difference:
285 kg
17.18 %
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG (12 - 15)

General

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
KL1Y
Generation
DXA
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Car Body Style
Multi-Purpose Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Autogas (LPG)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Front-wheel drive
6-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
5-speed manual transmission

Engine

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
Straight-four diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1998 CC
Engine Capacity
1596 CC
161 bhp
at 3800 rpm
Power
115 bhp
at 6400 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
161 bhp
115 bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
360 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
140 NM
at 4200 rpm
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
360 NM
140 NM
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG

Performance

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
121 mph
Maximum Speed
115 mph
9.9 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.1 sec
62 mph 62
mph

138 m
0.000 sec

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD

62 mph 62
mph

168 m
0.000 sec

Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG

▶ REPLAY
10.3 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
11.95 kg/bhp
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
10.3 kg/bhp
11.95 kg/bhp
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
Fuel Economy
44 mpg
combined
34 mpg
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
44 mpg
34 mpg
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
34 mpg
city
25 mpg
52 mpg
motorway
45 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
64 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
40 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
621 mi
Range
303 mi
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
621 mi
303 mi
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
Environmental Impact
131.6 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
120.9 kWh
Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
131.6 kWh
120.9 kWh
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
169 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
132 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Chevrolet Orlando 2.0TD
Ford C-MAX 1.6 Ti-VCT LPG
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
650 kg
Maximum Payload
486 kg
101 L
Boot Capacity
471 L
1594 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1723 L