The Comparative Analysis :

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12) vs. Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)

€ 37,500
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
€ 36,300
 Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11) Volvo XC60 2.0T
€ 37,500
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 36,300

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 is 1.8 cm longer, 8.6 cm narrower and 4.3 cm lower than the Volvo XC60 2.0T.
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 2.0T
1670
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12)
1805
2072
1713
Blueprint Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)
1891
2120
1805 mm
Width
1891 mm
2072 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2120 mm
1670 mm
Height
1713 mm
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12)
2670
4645
Blueprint Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)
2774
4627
4645 mm
Length
4627 mm
2670 mm
Wheelbase
2774 mm

Vehicle Weight

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 2.0T
1715 kg
Kerb Weight
1833 kg
2290 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
2270 kg
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12)
Weight Difference:
118 kg
6.44 %
Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)

General

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 2.0T
V
Generation
D
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
On-demand four-wheel drive with engagement by the vehicle's operator
Drive
Front-wheel drive
Continuously variable transmission (CVT)
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Straight-four petrol engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Code
B4204T6
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2360 CC
Engine Capacity
1999 CC
168 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Power
200 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
168 bhp
200 bhp
Volvo XC60 2.0T
232 NM
at 4100 rpm
Max. Torque
300 NM
at 1750 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
232 NM
300 NM
Volvo XC60 2.0T

Performance

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 2.0T
118 mph
Maximum Speed
127 mph
11.7 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
8.9 sec
62 mph 62
mph

163 m
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4

62 mph 62
mph

124 m
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 2.0T

▶ REPLAY
10.21 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
9.17 kg/bhp
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
10.21 kg/bhp
9.17 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 2.0T

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Fuel Economy
31 mpg
combined
33 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
31 mpg
33 mpg
Volvo XC60 2.0T
23 mpg
city
25 mpg
39 mpg
motorway
41 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
60 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
70 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
409 mi
Range
512 mi
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
409 mi
512 mi
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Environmental Impact
172.4 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
161.1 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
172.4 kWh
161.1 kWh
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 5
216 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
198 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 2.0T
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
575 kg
Maximum Payload
437 kg
184 L
Boot Capacity
495 L
1686 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1455 L