The Comparative Analysis :

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12) vs. Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)

€ 37,500
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
€ 36,300
Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11) Volvo XC60 2.0T
€ 37,500
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 36,300

Base price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 is 0.7 inches longer, 3.4 inches narrower and 1.7 inches lower than the Volvo XC60 2.0T.
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 2.0T
65.7
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12)
71.1
81.6
67.4
Blueprint Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)
74.4
83.5
71.1 in
Width
74.4 in
81.6 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
83.5 in
65.7 in
Height
67.4 in
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12)
105.1
182.9
Blueprint Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)
109.2
182.2
182.9 in
Length
182.2 in
105.1 in
Wheelbase
109.2 in

Vehicle Weight

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 2.0T
3781 lb
Curb Weight
4041 lb
5049 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
5004 lb
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4 CVT (08 - 12)
Weight Difference:
260 lb
6.43 %
Volvo XC60 2.0T Powershift Geartronic (10 - 11)

General

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 2.0T
V
Generation
D
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
On-demand four-wheel drive (4WD) with engagement by the vehicle's operator
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
Continuously variable transmission (CVT)
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Straight-four gasoline engine (nat­u­ral­ly as­pi­rat­ed engine)
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Code
B4204T6
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
2.4 L / 117 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
168 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
200 hp
at 6000 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
168 hp
200 hp
Volvo XC60 2.0T
171 lb‑ft
at 4100 rpm
Max. Torque
221 lb‑ft
at 1750 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
171 lb‑ft
221 lb‑ft
Volvo XC60 2.0T

Performance

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 2.0T
118 mph
Maximum Speed
127 mph
11.7 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
8.9 sec
62 mph 62
mph

535 ft
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4

62 mph 62
mph

407 ft
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 2.0T

 REPLAY
22.51 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
20.21 lb/hp
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
22.51 lb/hp
20.21 lb/hp
Volvo XC60 2.0T

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Fuel Economy
26 mpg
combined
28 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
26 mpg
28 mpg
Volvo XC60 2.0T
19 mpg
city
21 mpg
32 mpg
highway
34 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
15.9 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
18.5 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
409 mi
Range
512 mi
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
409 mi
512 mi
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Environmental Impact
172.4 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
161.1 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
172.4 kWh
161.1 kWh
Volvo XC60 2.0T
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 5
348 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
319 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Citroen C-Crosser 2.4
Volvo XC60 2.0T
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
1268 lb
Maximum Payload
963 lb
5.2 cu ft
Trunk Volume
14 cu ft
47.7 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
41.2 cu ft