The Comparative Analysis :

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) vs. Volvo XC60 2.4D AWD Geartronic (08 - 10)

€ 40,100
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
€ 38,000
Volvo XC60 2.4D AWD Geartronic (08 - 10) Volvo XC60 2.4D
€ 40,100
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 38,000

Base price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP is 1.8 cm longer, 8.6 cm narrower and 4.3 cm lower than the Volvo XC60 2.4D.
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.4D
1670
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
1805
2072
1713
Blueprint Volvo XC60 2.4D AWD Geartronic (08 - 10)
1891
2120
1805 mm
Width
1891 mm
2072 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2120 mm
1670 mm
Height
1713 mm
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
2670
4645
Blueprint Volvo XC60 2.4D AWD Geartronic (08 - 10)
2774
4627
4645 mm
Length
4627 mm
2670 mm
Wheelbase
2774 mm

Vehicle Weight

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.4D
1845 kg
Kerb Weight
1808 kg
2410 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
2505 kg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
Weight Difference:
37 kg
2.01 %
Volvo XC60 2.4D AWD Geartronic (08 - 10)

General

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.4D
V
Generation
D
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Diesel
On-demand four-wheel drive with engagement by the vehicle's operator
Drive
Permanent all-wheel drive
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
6-speed automatic transmission

Engine

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Straight-four diesel engine with two tur­bo­chargers (bi­turbo)
Engine Type
Straight-five diesel engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Code
D5244T5
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
5
2179 CC
Engine Capacity
2400 CC
154 bhp
at 4000 rpm
Power
161 bhp
at 4000 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
154 bhp
161 bhp
Volvo XC60 2.4D
380 NM
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
420 NM
at 1500 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
380 NM
420 NM
Volvo XC60 2.4D

Performance

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.4D
123 mph
Maximum Speed
124 mph
12.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
10.9 sec
62 mph 62
mph

174 m
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

62 mph 62
mph

151 m
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 2.4D

 REPLAY
11.98 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
11.23 kg/bhp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
11.98 kg/bhp
11.23 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 2.4D

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Fuel Economy
39 mpg
combined
38 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
39 mpg
38 mpg
Volvo XC60 2.4D
31 mpg
city
28 mpg
46 mpg
motorway
46 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
60 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
70 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
511 mi
Range
580 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
511 mi
580 mi
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Environmental Impact
150.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
154.3 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
150.2 kWh
154.3 kWh
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 4 III
192 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
199 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.4D
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
565 kg
Maximum Payload
697 kg
184 L
Boot Capacity
495 L
1686 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1455 L