The Comparative Analysis :
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) vs. Volvo XC60 2.4D AWD Geartronic (08 - 10)
€ 40,100
€ 38,000
€ 40,100
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 38,000
ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info
Vehicle Dimensions
The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP is 0.7 inches longer, 3.4 inches narrower and 1.7 inches lower than the Volvo XC60 2.4D.
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.4D
65.7
71.1
81.6
67.4
74.4
83.5
71.1 in
Width
74.4 in
81.6 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
83.5 in
65.7 in
Height
67.4 in
105.1
182.9
109.2
182.2
182.9 in
Length
182.2 in
105.1 in
Wheelbase
109.2 in
Vehicle Weight
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.4D
4068 lb
Curb Weight
3986 lb
5313 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
Weight
5523 lb
Weight Difference:
82 lb
2.02 %
General
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.4D
V
Generation
D
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Diesel
Fuel Type
Diesel
On-demand four-wheel drive (4WD) with engagement by the vehicle's operator
Drivetrain
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
6-speed automatic transmission
Engine
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Straight-four diesel engine with two turbochargers (biturbo)
Engine Type
Straight-five diesel engine with turbocharger
Engine Code
D5244T5
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
5
2.2 L / 108 cu in
Displacement
2.4 L / 117 cu in
154 hp
at 4000 rpm
Power
161 hp
at 4000 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
154 hp
161 hp
Volvo XC60 2.4D
280 lb‑ft
at 2000 rpm
Max. Torque
310 lb‑ft
at 1500 rpm
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
280 lb‑ft
310 lb‑ft
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Performance
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.4D
123 mph
Maximum Speed
124 mph
12.5 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
10.9 sec
62 mph
62
mph
mph
571 ft
0.000 sec
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
62 mph
62
mph
mph
495 ft
0.000 sec
Volvo XC60 2.4D
▶ REPLAY
26.42 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
24.76 lb/hp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
26.42 lb/hp
24.76 lb/hp
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Fuel Economy / Emissions
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Fuel Economy
32 mpg
combined
31 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
32 mpg
31 mpg
Volvo XC60 2.4D
26 mpg
city
23 mpg
39 mpg
highway
39 mpg
15.9 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
18.5 gal
511 mi
Range
580 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
511 mi
580 mi
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Environmental Impact
150.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
154.3 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
150.2 kWh
154.3 kWh
Volvo XC60 2.4D
Euro 4
Emission Standard
Euro 4 III
309 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
320 g/mi (NEFZ)
Practical Convenience
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Volvo XC60 2.4D
5
Doors
5
7
No. of Seats
5
1246 lb
Maximum Payload
1537 lb
5.2 cu ft
Trunk Volume
14 cu ft
47.7 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
41.2 cu ft
