The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost (18 - ..) vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)

€ 25,500
Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost (18 - ..) Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost
€ 36,000
 Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11) Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
€ 25,500
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 36,000

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ considerably. The Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost is 19.8 cm shorter, 6.5 cm wider and 3.3 cm lower than the Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo.
Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
1482
Blueprint Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost (18 - ..)
1825
1979
1515
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
1760
2044
1825 mm
Width
1760 mm
1979 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2044 mm
1482 mm
Height
1515 mm
Blueprint Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost (18 - ..)
2700
4387
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
2635
4585
4387 mm
Length
4585 mm
2700 mm
Wheelbase
2635 mm

Vehicle Weight

Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
1322 kg
Kerb Weight
No data
1855 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
No data
Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost (18 - ..)
Weight Difference:
No data
No data
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)

General

Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
DEH
Generation
CY0
Hatchback
Car Body Style
Hatchback
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Front-wheel drive
Drive
Permanent all-wheel drive
6-speed manual transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Straight-three petrol engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
3
Cylinders
4
998 CC
Engine Capacity
1998 CC
123 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Power
237 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost
123 bhp
237 bhp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
170 NM
at 1400 rpm
Max. Torque
343 NM
at 2500 rpm
Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost
170 NM
343 NM
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

Performance

Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
122 mph
Maximum Speed
137 mph
10.3 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.1 sec
62 mph 62
mph

143 m
0.000 sec

Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost

62 mph 62
mph

99 m
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

▶ REPLAY
10.75 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
No data
Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost
10.75 kg/bhp
0 kg/bhp
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Fuel Economy
59 mpg
combined
28 mpg
Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost
59 mpg
28 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
48 mpg
city
20 mpg
69 mpg
motorway
35 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
52 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
59 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
673 mi
Range
359 mi
Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost
673 mi
359 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Environmental Impact
90.9 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
193.3 kWh
Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost
90.9 kWh
193.3 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
Euro 6d-TEMP (WLTP) 36AG-AI
Emission Standard
Euro 4 / Euro 5
133 g/km (WLTP)
CO2 Emissions
243 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Focus Active 1.0 EcoBoost
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback 2.0 16V Turbo
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
533 kg
Maximum Payload
No data
341 L
Boot Capacity
288 L
1320 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1349 L