The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo 4x4 Durashift-5-tronic (08 - 12) vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15)

€ 30,300
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo 4x4 Durashift-5-tronic (08 - 12) Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
€ 40,300
 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15) Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
€ 30,300
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 40,300

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo is 7.8 cm longer, 5.8 cm narrower and 4.2 cm taller than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4.
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
1677
Blueprint Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo 4x4 Durashift-5-tronic (08 - 12)
1842
2042
1635
Blueprint Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15)
1900
2100
1842 mm
Width
1900 mm
2042 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2100 mm
1677 mm
Height
1635 mm
Blueprint Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo 4x4 Durashift-5-tronic (08 - 12)
2690
4443
Blueprint Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15)
2660
4365
4443 mm
Length
4365 mm
2690 mm
Wheelbase
2660 mm

Vehicle Weight

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
1653 kg
Kerb Weight
1640 kg
2130 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
2350 kg
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo 4x4 Durashift-5-tronic (08 - 12)
Weight Difference:
13 kg
0.79 %
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15)

General

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
DM2
Generation
LV
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Unleaded (95 RON)
Permanent all-wheel drive
Drive
Permanent all-wheel drive
5-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed automatic transmission

Engine

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Straight-five petrol engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four petrol engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
5
Cylinders
4
2521 CC
Engine Capacity
1999 CC
197 bhp
at 6000 rpm
Power
237 bhp
at 5500 rpm
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
197 bhp
237 bhp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
320 NM
at 1600 rpm
Max. Torque
340 NM
at 1750 rpm
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
320 NM
340 NM
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4

Performance

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
127 mph
Maximum Speed
135 mph
8.8 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.6 sec
62 mph 62
mph

122 m
0.000 sec

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo

62 mph 62
mph

106 m
0.000 sec

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4

▶ REPLAY
8.39 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
6.92 kg/bhp
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
8.39 kg/bhp
6.92 kg/bhp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Fuel Economy
27 mpg
combined
32 mpg
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
27 mpg
32 mpg
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
19 mpg
city
24 mpg
36 mpg
motorway
41 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
58 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
70 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
350 mi
Range
500 mi
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
350 mi
500 mi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Environmental Impact
195.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
164.8 kWh
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
195.2 kWh
164.8 kWh
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Euro 4 / Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
244 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
199 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
477 kg
Maximum Payload
710 kg
410 L
Boot Capacity
575 L
1405 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1445 L