The Comparative Analysis :

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo 4x4 Durashift-5-tronic (08 - 12) vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15)

€ 30,300
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo 4x4 Durashift-5-tronic (08 - 12) Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
€ 40,300
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15) Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
€ 30,300
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 40,300

Base price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo is 3.1 inches longer, 2.3 inches narrower and 1.7 inches taller than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4.
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
66
Blueprint Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo 4x4 Durashift-5-tronic (08 - 12)
72.5
80.4
64.4
Blueprint Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15)
74.8
82.7
72.5 in
Width
74.8 in
80.4 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
82.7 in
66 in
Height
64.4 in
Blueprint Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo 4x4 Durashift-5-tronic (08 - 12)
105.9
174.9
Blueprint Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15)
104.7
171.9
174.9 in
Length
171.9 in
105.9 in
Wheelbase
104.7 in

Vehicle Weight

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
3644 lb
Curb Weight
3616 lb
4696 lb
Gross Vehicle
Weight
5181 lb
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo 4x4 Durashift-5-tronic (08 - 12)
Weight Difference:
29 lb
0.8 %
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4 Automatic (11 - 15)

General

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
DM2
Generation
LV
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
Drivetrain
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
5-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed automatic transmission

Engine

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Straight-five gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
5
Cylinders
4
2.5 L / 122 cu in
Displacement
2 L / 98 cu in
197 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
237 hp
at 5500 rpm
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
197 hp
237 hp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
236 lb‑ft
at 1600 rpm
Max. Torque
251 lb‑ft
at 1750 rpm
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
236 lb‑ft
251 lb‑ft
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4

Performance

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
127 mph
Maximum Speed
135 mph
8.8 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
7.6 sec
62 mph 62
mph

400 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo

62 mph 62
mph

348 ft
0.000 sec

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4

 REPLAY
18.5 lb/hp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
15.26 lb/hp
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
18.5 lb/hp
15.26 lb/hp
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Fuel Economy
23 mpg
combined
27 mpg
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
23 mpg
27 mpg
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
16 mpg
city
20 mpg
30 mpg
highway
34 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
15.3 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
18.5 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
350 mi
Range
500 mi
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
350 mi
500 mi
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Environmental Impact
195.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
164.8 kWh
Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
195.2 kWh
164.8 kWh
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
Euro 4 / Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 5
393 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
320 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Ford Kuga 2.5 Turbo
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2.0 Si4
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
5
1052 lb
Maximum Payload
1565 lb
11.6 cu ft
Trunk Volume
16.3 cu ft
39.8 cu ft
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
40.9 cu ft