The Comparative Analysis :

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11) vs. Ford Focus Sedan 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 17)

€ 36,000
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11) Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
€ 21,900
 Ford Focus Sedan 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 17) Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
€ 36,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 21,900

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo is 1.3 inches longer, 2.5 inches narrower and 0.8 inches taller than the Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp.
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
58.7
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
69.3
80.5
57.8
Blueprint Ford Focus Sedan 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 17)
71.8
79.3
69.3 in
Width
71.8 in
80.5 in
Width Incl. Mirrors
79.3 in
58.7 in
Height
57.8 in
Blueprint Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
103.7
179.9
Blueprint Ford Focus Sedan 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 17)
104.3
178.7
179.9 in
Length
178.7 in
103.7 in
Wheelbase
104.3 in

Vehicle Weight

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
No data
Curb Weight
2879 lb
No data
Gross Vehicle
Weight
4189 lb
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo Ralliart TC-SST (09 - 11)
Weight Difference:
No data
No data
Ford Focus Sedan 1.0 EcoBoost (14 - 17)

General

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
CY0
Generation
DYB
Sedan
Car Body Style
Sedan
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Fuel Type
Mid-Grade Unleaded
Permanent all-wheel drive (AWD)
Drivetrain
Front-wheel drive
6-speed dual clutch transmission
Transmission
6-speed manual transmission

Engine

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Straight-four gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-three gasoline engine with tur­bo­charger
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
3
2 L / 98 cu in
Displacement
1 L / 49 cu in
237 hp
at 6000 rpm
Power
123 hp
at 6000 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
237 hp
123 hp
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
253 lb‑ft
at 2500 rpm
Max. Torque
125 lb‑ft
at 1400 rpm
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
253 lb‑ft
125 lb‑ft
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp

Performance

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
143 mph
Maximum Speed
121 mph
7 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
11.1 sec
62 mph 62
mph

318 ft
0.000 sec

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo

62 mph 62
mph

505 ft
0.000 sec

Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp

▶ REPLAY
No data
Weight-to-Power Ratio
23.41 lb/hp
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
0 lb/hp
23.41 lb/hp
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Fuel Economy
24 mpg
combined
49 mpg
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
24 mpg
49 mpg
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
17 mpg
city
41 mpg
30 mpg
highway
56 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
14.5 gal
Fuel Tank Capacity
14.5 gal
Kraftstoffanzeige
342 mi
Range
712 mi
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
342 mi
712 mi
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Environmental Impact
189.4 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
90.9 kWh
Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
189.4 kWh
90.9 kWh
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
Euro 4 / Euro 5
Emission Standard
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
383 g/mi (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
177 g/mi (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Mitsubishi Lancer 2.0 16V Turbo
Ford Focus 1.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp
4
Doors
4
5
No. of Seats
5
No data
Maximum Payload
1310 lb
9.1 cu ft
Trunk Volume
13.5 cu ft
No data
Cargo Volume (Seats Down)
No data