The Comparative Analysis :

Volvo XC60 T5 AWD Geartronic (17 - 17) vs. Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)

€ 51,000
Volvo XC60 T5 AWD Geartronic (17 - 17) Volvo XC60 T5
€ 40,100
 Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12) Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
€ 51,000
Base Price ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch.
€ 40,100

ⓘBase price of a new vehicle with standard equipment in Germany at market launch. Price Info

Vehicle Dimensions

The dimensions of these vehicles differ slightly. The Volvo XC60 T5 is 4.3 cm longer, 9.7 cm wider and 1.2 cm lower than the Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP.
Volvo XC60 T5
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
1658
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T5 AWD Geartronic (17 - 17)
1902
2117
1670
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
1805
2072
1902 mm
Width
1805 mm
2117 mm
Width Incl. Mirrors
2072 mm
1658 mm
Height
1670 mm
Blueprint Volvo XC60 T5 AWD Geartronic (17 - 17)
2865
4688
Blueprint Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)
2670
4645
4688 mm
Length
4645 mm
2865 mm
Wheelbase
2670 mm

Vehicle Weight

Volvo XC60 T5
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
2081 kg
Kerb Weight
1845 kg
2470 kg
Gross Vehicle
Weight
2410 kg
Volvo XC60 T5 AWD Geartronic (17 - 17)
Weight Difference:
236 kg
11.34 %
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP DCS (09 - 12)

General

Volvo XC60 T5
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
U
Generation
V
Sport Utility Vehicle
Car Body Style
Sport Utility Vehicle
Unleaded (95 RON)
Fuel Type
Diesel
Permanent all-wheel drive
Drive
On-demand four-wheel drive with engagement by the vehicle's operator
8-speed automatic transmission
Transmission
6-speed dual clutch transmission

Engine

Volvo XC60 T5
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Straight-four petrol engine with tur­bo­charger
Engine Type
Straight-four diesel engine with two tur­bo­chargers (bi­turbo)
B4204T23
Engine Code
4
Valves
4
4
Cylinders
4
1969 CC
Engine Capacity
2179 CC
251 bhp
at 5500 rpm
Power
154 bhp
at 4000 rpm
Volvo XC60 T5
251 bhp
154 bhp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
350 NM
at 1500 rpm
Max. Torque
380 NM
at 2000 rpm
Volvo XC60 T5
350 NM
380 NM
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

Performance

Volvo XC60 T5
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
137 mph
Maximum Speed
123 mph
6.8 sec
Acceleration 0 to 62 mph
12.5 sec
62 mph 62
mph

94 m
0.000 sec

Volvo XC60 T5

62 mph 62
mph

174 m
0.000 sec

Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

▶ REPLAY
8.29 kg/bhp
Weight-to-Power Ratio
11.98 kg/bhp
Volvo XC60 T5
8.29 kg/bhp
11.98 kg/bhp
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP

Fuel Economy / Emissions

Volvo XC60 T5
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Fuel Economy
39 mpg
combined
39 mpg
Volvo XC60 T5
39 mpg
39 mpg
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
31 mpg
city
31 mpg
45 mpg
motorway
46 mpg
Kraftstoffanzeige
60 L
Fuel Tank Capacity
60 L
Kraftstoffanzeige
511 mi
Range
511 mi
Volvo XC60 T5
511 mi
511 mi
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Environmental Impact
138.2 kWh
Total Energy Consumption
per 100 miles ⓘThe total energy consumption per 100 miles is the amount of energy consumed by a vehicle when burning fuel or using electricity per 100 miles (final energy), and the energy required to produce the appropriate amount of fuel or electricity (primary energy).
150.2 kWh
Volvo XC60 T5
138.2 kWh
150.2 kWh
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
Euro 6b (NEFZ)
Emission Standard
Euro 4
167 g/km (NEFZ)
CO2 Emissions
192 g/km (NEFZ)

Practical Convenience

Volvo XC60 T5
Citroen C-Crosser HDi 155 FAP
5
Doors
5
5
No. of Seats
7
389 kg
Maximum Payload
565 kg
505 L
Boot Capacity
184 L
1432 L
Boot Capacity (Seats Down)
1686 L